Skip to main content

Sadowski Intro Adolescents at School, Second Edition : Perspectives on Youth, Identity, and Education

 Adolescents at School, Second Edition : Perspectives on Youth, Identity, and Education

Introduction

Best Lines:

"standards, accountability, and testing movement is based primarily on a view of students as a group -  and the notion that if we put the right inputs and apply them in the right amounts, then eventually we'll get the right output..."

"...emphasize the realness..."

Said me: Our future inhabitants are going to laugh at our use of "race."

Questions

Do we hold onto the parts of our nature, expression, activities that are celebrated by others? 

Do we hold onto the parts of our nature, expression, activities, self that gain attention by others? 

Though we are all very unique and individual, can theorist agree that human beings in certain situations "act/perform" the same way 9 times out of 10? And if so, does the institution of social situations alter how students "feel" about certain topics, activities, areas of study? (ie outside of school, a student might love Art, but in the context of a classroom with the overhead of a grading system, and the peer pressure, do students need other activities in order to bring them back into a "cohesive" community "flow?" 

What are my students identity related issues? What context are they growing up in?


Application

It makes me wonder what a school based on what kids want to learn and what they want to hang onto would be profound. I keep envisioning a wall of "records" where kids index/post what they've learned and it could be about anything. It doesn't have to exist in the compartment of content, but they could talk about what they learned about themselves, their peer-dynamics, their existence, etc... 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Burton, J.M. Preface. Ch. 9. Early Adolescence: Ideas in search of forms

  Burton, J.M. Preface. Ch. 9. Early Adolescence: Ideas in search of forms This chapter gave a mixed assessment of children between the ages of 10-14 years old. My major take-away was how this period is an investigation of truth. Children are asking questions about themselves and the world around them. They are asking "serious" questions about life, connections, and hypocrisy. Due to the investigative mode (mindset) comic strips and doodling prove to be excellent forms of expression for thinking about topics, questions, streams of consciousness. Burton states that it is the "Stage of Reasoning" highlighted by Lowenfeld that is flanked by a shaky foundation of truth/reality and the need to use/relate to the culture and conditions of their circumstance.  The realization of multiple truths led me to my current unit for 8th grade. We are discussing topics such as race, privilege, (I don't know if "class" exists currently), and spirituality/religion. All to...

Developing Minds: Visual Events

  Questions: In the text, Professor Burton points out that "children at this age are thought to be at the height of their curiosity and imaginative powers," yet "stereotypic imagery, paucity of imaginative content, even disenchantment with the whole enterprise of creating art often emerges during this time." Why does that happen? How do these phases of artistic development relate to Art Therapy and its practices? Do therapists use the phases as a way to evaluate clients? How do the phases and need for therapy connect? Does the art show evidence of emotional phases children are in and does it offer tools for regulation that help with emotional needs and artistic development? Noticings: Professor Burton points out how materials guide what is being shown or the message. I wonder if that's the tactic of adult artists as well. Are there artists that showcase and express through material mostly?  Phases seem to go from "scribbles," to directionality, to encl...